Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Cordasco, Melinda Lelia en
dc.date.accessioned 2015-06-24T19:09:31Z en
dc.date.available 2015-06-24T19:09:31Z en
dc.date.issued 2015 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10211.3/141555 en
dc.description.abstract This research explores how language used in cases of sexual violence perpetuates gender bias and rape culture. Though courts are often seen as sites of impartial judgment, courtroom proceedings are littered with gendered language that reinforces stereotypes of victim and offender. Rape laws and courtroom arguments consistently affirm masculinist interpretations of harm, leaving little room for interpretations of sexual violence as anything other than bodily injury. Analysis of gendered language in sexual violence cases often focuses on of victims during trial proceedings and less focused on briefs, memorandums, and motions. Using court documents from 16 cases over a six-year period I examine how lawyers deploy gendered and stereotypes, reinforce bodily injury as the ultimate measure of valid harm, and fail to address psychological trauma. This language fosters biased judgment and reinforces institutionalized rape culture. en
dc.format.extent viii, 56 leaves en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher San Francisco State University en
dc.rights Copyright by Melinda Lelia Cordasco, 2015 en
dc.source AS36 2015 HMSX .C67 en
dc.title Courts' response to rape victims - it's all for show en
dc.type Thesis en
dc.contributor.department Human Sexuality Studies en
dc.description.degree Sexuality Studies

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

My Account

RSS Feeds