Beyond mythology: understanding the Mcdowell-Dreyfus debate

In this thesis I examine the debate between John McDowell and Hubert Dreyfus. I narrow the debate down to what I believe is its most fundamental concern: the extent to which conceptual rationality plays a role in our skillful engagement with the world. I provide an exposition of the main arguments presented by each thinker in an attempt to lead the reader to a clearer understanding of the debate. I side with McDowell, I claim that his distinction between two psychological states enables him to successfully rebut Dreyfus' strongest critique, and provide a coherent account of the mind-world relation.